Home Our Locations The Courts Attorney Resources Client Victories Contact Us
Quick Legal Advice
Most questions are answered within 24hours
Name :
Phone :
Email :
Your Question :
     
 
  Refusals-Breathalyzer
  Operating While Intoxicated
  Operating While Intoxicated - Drugs
  Operating While Visibly Impaired
  Operating While Intoxicated - Minor(Zero Tolerance)
  Licensing Sanctions
  Reckless Driving
  Operating While Intoxicated - Causing Injury
  Operating While Intoxicated - Causing Death
  Negligent Homicide
  Involuntary Manslaughter
  Field Sobriety Tests
  Frequently Asked Questions
  Blood / Breath Alcohol Calculator
  Sentencing
  People vs Nanjappa
  People vs Hines
  People vs Garrison
  People vs Gary
  People vs Hullet
  People vs Highley-Mader
  People vs Golden
  People vs Edwards
  People vs Ott
  People vs BaumGartner
  People vs Ware
  People vs Bendle
  People vs Jones
  People vs Tringalli
  People vs Westcott
  People vs Malega
  People vs Pung
 
 
  DRUNK DRIVING / DUI / OWI
  SEX CRIMES / CSC
  ASSAULT - MURDER
  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  THEFT / LARCENY
  DRUG CRIMES
  MDOP - ARSON
  WEAPONS CRIMES
  INTERNET CRIMES
  CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
  TRAFFIC VIOLATION
  DRIVERS LICENSE RESTORATION
  PERSONAL PROTECTION ORDERS
  JUVENILE CRIMES
 
Follow AmbroseLawGroup on Twitter

Follow AmbroseLawGroup on Wordpress
   
 

Contact Daniel Ambrose directly for fast answers to your Criminal Law Questions at the Office at (248) 624-5500, on his cell phone at (248) 808-3130 or by email at daniel@ambroselawgroup.com

 
CLIENT VICTORIES
 
  People v. Edwards
(Drunk Driving) 46th District Court Southfield

On May 28, 2006, Ken is driving home from a nightclub in Detroit. Officer Wysoki of the Southfield Police stops him for swerving and speeding. The officer proceeds to put Ken through a battery of field sobriety tests and then arrests Ken for drunk driving. Ken is taken to the station and blows a .15 on the breathalizer.

The real story of that evening is that Ken is out with a friend and drinks six beers over the course of the evening. His actual Blood Alcohol Concentration should have been about a .04 to .06 if the machine had been accurate. Ken had been jumped, beaten, and robbed just before being arrested. He had sustained injuries to the inside of his mouth that were bleeding.

Our theory was that the blood in Ken's mouth contaminated his breath test and caused it to read much higher than it should have. The first trial ended on November 11, 2006 after three days. A hung jury was split 5 to 1 to convict. In spite of this Ken decided to go to trial again. The trial was set for January 12, 2007. Ken and I showed up ready for trial. The court had lost all the exhibits from the last trial. The court adjourned this trial date to give us an opportunity to recreate the exhibits, mainly photos of Ken's injuries and photos of the roadway. There were no copies of the photos.

On March 29, 2007, after three days of trial and 34 minutes of deliberation, the jury had reached a verdict. When we were called to the courtroom the prosecutor appeared with his typical confidant smile on his face. Ken and I were terrified. The jury had not even asked to see the exhibits. The foreman rose. The judge says "Have you reached a verdict? If so please read it." He unfolds the verdict form and reads "We the jury in the above entitled case of the People of the State of Michigan verses Kenneth Allen Edwards find the defendant NOT GUILTY!"

We spoke with the jury. They said that what really motivated them to find in Ken's favor was they felt that the police had lied throughout the trial. They also said that they did not like the smirks on the faces of the officers and wanted to wipe them off.

And they did!

 
  Click on the picture to view it enlarged
 
Police Report
  Video Clips
 
In Car Camera captures the Arrest
Dan Ambrose brings his expert to the stand for Direct Examination
Mr. Edwards is asked about his plight by Dan Ambrose on Direct Examination
Dan Ambrose switches places and takes the stand while Mr. Edwards demonstrates the event. Click on photo for the video.
 
Closing Argument (Part 1)
Closing Argument (Part 2)
Justice is Served
"We the Jury Find the Defendant NOT GUILTY"
Mr. Edwards talks about his experience. He explains how his confidence in his lawyer and in his case gave him the strength to go to trial a second time.
 
 
  The Ambrose Law Group is comprised of trial lawyers who specialize in Criminal Defense, DUI Defense, Bankruptcy, Family Law, Civil Litigation, CPS Defense, Juvenile Law, and Estates and Trusts. We represent clients in Oakland, Wayne, Macomb, Livingston, Lapeer, Genesee, and Washtenaw Counties.
  © Copyright 2009 Ambrose Law Group, all right reserved. Designed by Adventum